I was trying to decide the layout for connecting my 12 panels in 4 strings of 3. Physically the panels will be in 2 rows, with 7 in the top row, and under that, 5 panels. I want to optimize it so as to use the least amount of cable to run to the combiner box. Asking Grok, (Ai) the optimal layout, came up with an almost identical layout to my first guess. However, more importantly, I also asked for how much additional cable I'd need (extensions).
I'm not relying on its answer---I've ordered extra, cuz I know I'll use it somewhere down the line anyway. But, it's kinda cool that I could just give a simple description, along with a link to my panel specs to get an answer that should be 'in the ballpark.'
After getting an answer to my initial result, I realized that my (first) description of the combiner box being 2 meters below panel 9 might be misinterpretted. I was correct, I had to specify "from the bottom of the panel" as Grok used the middle of the panel, reducing the total wire requirements.
Anyhow, I've ordered 30m of black and 30m of red, and some mc4 connectors. Plus, it was cool that I could as for a graphical representation of the system with connection information... It gave me an ascii version, but that's fine (though my font shifted the connection to the CB to the left...
If I'd used a unispace font, it should be aligned.)
Warning: Ideally, the wires (+ and - ), or at least the total circuit length for each of the 4 strings should be the same length to avoid having different voltages (from voltage drop). However, my string total circuit lengths are relatively short, so any voltage drop with having a slightly longer string circuit length will be negligible.
YMMV, I've added this in case someone is planning their own system. If you've got longer runs, and/or significantly different lengths, you may have a problem with voltage drop. (i.e. My research says that an industry standard is <3% voltage drop for PV s is acceptable)