Results of Capacity Testing 18650s for 1,600+ Cycles

diegobg

New member
Joined
Mar 22, 2020
Messages
3
Generic said:
@Diegobg - Nice work! The 2 Amp discharge is putting more stress on the cells, so it looks like they are degrading faster, about 9% loss in capacity, right? Are the cells heating up at all?

Thanks!It is right. For now, the Liitokala NCR18650B cell has lost 10% or so degradation in 300 cycles.On the temperature, perhaps they heat up a little more than in the Opus test at 1Amp, but not much more. I think that in Opus the cells get very hot from the heat generated by Opus itself.

Now I am doing the same test to the cells of Varicore (another Chinese cell). These have degraded very quickly at first, but after 60 cycles they seem to stabilize. I leave you link:https://electrotinker.com/en/analysis/degradation-ncr18650b-varicore/
 

Generic

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Messages
210
I skipped the update at 1300 cycles, but here I am at 1400! Here's the graph:


image_gxxfcs.jpg


And where we are at SoH:


image_wrsvfq.jpg


I also set out to see if degradation is linear or exponential. The CJ and THLD were clearly exponential. The ASO and LG cells, I'm not sure. Here is a chart showing the rate of change. For example, the data point at 200 is the % increase in degradation from Cycle 201-205 over the degradation in Cycle 101-105, and so on. The LG looks fairly linear, while the ASO seems to be going exponential.


image_ancghp.jpg
 

Generic

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Messages
210
First off, I made a mistake. I write down every result on a notepad, and then do data entry into excel when I hit a milestone and am ready to report an update. Well, for some reason, I wrote Cycle 1528 twice (...1527, 1528, 1528, 1529...). What I decided to do is average the results of the 2 cycles and use that number as the entry for Cycle 1528. To make up the test cycle, I will skip over Cycle 1666, assuming I get to that point, because I don't like that number :angel: .

Second, I kind of discovered something that I wanted to run by the community. I never really paid attention to the THLD cell's "INR18650" designation, as I understand that INR/ICR/IMR/NCR don't actually signify chemistry and are just naming conventions, but it got me thinking. If the THLD cell is labeled as an INR cell, and it actually is an INR (Lithium Manganese Nickel) vs. being an ICR (Lithium Cobalt Oxide), then the results of my degradation testing don't signify quality, but rather chemistry. It's not that the CJ and THLD cells are Chinese junk, but rather, they are low-cobalt-content INR cells that typically have a shorter life than their cobalt-rich ICR cousins. That also got me thinking again. If the CJ and THLD cells were truly INR cells, why did their PTC protection kick in to limit their short-circuit discharge to just 2 amps and why did the cells still heat up at that low of a discharge rate? My theory is that, since much of the cost of INR cells comes from having thicker copper and aluminum collectors, the Chinese manufacturers used thinner current collectors, while also using the low-cobalt INR chemistry. Thatwould explain how they got their cost down. So high discharge chemistry without the ability to do high discharge. What do you all think about that theory?


image_akfznn.jpg



image_luiazz.jpg
 

Korishan

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2017
Messages
6,395
That's very interesting.

Another thing to bring to attention is that Cobalt is also hard to come by. So having lower cobalt content also makes sense. Congo is where the worlds largest Cobalt mine is.

https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/top-cobalt-producing-countries/ said:
Congo is the leading cobalt producing country, accounting for more than 60% of the worlds cobalt production of 140 million metric tonnes in 2018. Cobalt is mostly mined as a byproduct of either copper or nickel. China is the leading consumer of cobalt, driven by the demand from its rechargeable battery industry.
And then Russia at only 250k metric tonnes.

So if there's any dispute between Congo and China, China can't easily switch resources.

I also didn't realize that Cobalt was a byproduct of copper/nickel mining. So that'd be another resource China would be after from them.




Side note: I appreciate you keeping your updates on the first posting and helping to keep the thread clean. Good work Generic. You are definitely not a generic user, but very professional imho. Maybe we change your username to Professional instead ;)
 

OffGridInTheCity

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Messages
1,462
Continued thanks for doing this.

My oldest battery (14s120p) has just passed 756 cycles at an average 47% DOD with no noticeable degradation - e.g. the packs don't require any balance to keep up withe very newest packs (<100 cycles). I'm hoping that at 50% DOD I'll get at leasttwice the numbers you're getting.... but the chemistry idea is interesting.

Note: The battery above is (aprox)50%LG-MF1-18650s and 50% Samsung-ICR18650-22P... that were 'new' - e.g. that massBatteryHookup ebike cell purchase a couple of years ago+ ebay 36v ebike 'new' packs.
 

Generic

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Messages
210
Korishan - As far as I know, cobalt is the single most expensive part of an 18650. Which is why I posted the theory above, to get generic cells cheaper, they have to lower the cobalt content. It's not like these things are handmade and they save on labor. Also, it's not me trying to be professional, it's just my frustration with some threads I read that are like 15 pages long and you have to read every post to figure out what is going on, so I did it for people like myself who might click on this thread and have all the information they need just from the first post.

OffGrid - I think you will get A LOT of cycles. Your cells run cooler, with lower demand, and with a smaller depth of discharge than what I'm doing in this test. I honestly thought I'd be done after 100 cycles and here I am 18+months later still going. BTW, not to get too off-topic, but weren't those 22P's found to be fake later on? That would be interesting!
 

OffGridInTheCity

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Messages
1,462
Generic said:
Korishan - As far as I know, cobalt is the single most expensive part of an 18650. Which is why I posted the theory above, to get generic cells cheaper, they have to lower the cobalt content. It's not like these things are handmade and they save on labor. Also, it's not me trying to be professional, it's just my frustration with some threads I read that are like 15 pages long and you have to read every post to figure out what is going on, so I did it for people like myself who might click on this thread and have all the information they need just from the first post.

OffGrid - I think you will get A LOT of cycles. Your cells run cooler, with lower demand, and with a smaller depth of discharge than what I'm doing in this test. I honestly thought I'd be done after 100 cycles and here I am 18+months later still going. BTW, not to get too off-topic, but weren't those 22P's found to be fake later on? That would be interesting!
Interesting... Here's a pic of the mix of cells in my 1st battery (discussed above). The 22Ps tested 100% at the time. It was in the beginning for me, when I believed that ebay 'generic' purchases couldn't be 'all bad'. Looking closely this morning, the 22Ps are30% of the battery rather than50% (just to correct the record). The date codes worked - https://batterybro.com/pages/18650-date-code-lookup-tool=> Nov 3, 2015 (for example)lending legitimacy in my mind.

image_lmocpn.jpg


Here's an example of one of the ebay purchases for these 22Ps.... I was trying for 10a, MF1 cells thinking other ebike packs must be similar - and indeed the first fewhadMF1s, but then the rest started coming with22Ps. My purchasing was ill-informed (based on what I know now)so I just got lucky in performance but totally overpaid at $2.25/cell:).

image_pfrecw.jpg
 

slipkn67

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2020
Messages
7
This is very useful for the community! I never thought a 10 years old used 18650 can do 1000+ full cycles at 1A with almost no capacity loss. Did other brands make such high quality cells 10 years ago?
Would also be interested to see similar tests for other popular old brand cells like:
Samsung 22F, Samsung 26F (26C, 26D)
Sanyo UR18650FM and others
some old Panasonic and Sony

Thank your for the work you've done for the community.
 

humbleONE

New member
Joined
Jul 22, 2020
Messages
9
Wow I read the first page of comments and I think it took me towards an hour, but reading six pages is out for now lol
Great to see someone with the mental stamina to do so many tests over sooooo long, how's your brain doing now?

For my powerwall project I just finished charging and testing just over 1000 cells almost with a single tester (4 slot) and it took me probably about 4 months 24hrs/day...
I'll make another post elsewhere on this but after doing it for so long when finished I really felt "lost" not doing the "habit" any more lol it literally took over my life for the time during this idiotic lockdown crap in Victoria's literal "police State".
BTW I live alone.... ;) so a small powerwall will do me!

I was surprised at the start of the posts that LG was being canned as I'd read, heard and believed they were pretty good cells, in fact among the best, hence why they are used in "not so cheap" vacuum cleaners.... good to read near the bottom of the first page they almost outperformed everything else for performance and longevity. Go LG! (LG 2200 mAh cells are the largest concentration of cells I own for my project!)

Cheers all

Oh sh*t I joined here in July so it was nearer 6 months not 4! WOW
 

enki

New member
Joined
Nov 9, 2019
Messages
6
I recreated the data from the newest graph (1585 cycles) for other curious souls using the excellent Web Plot Digitizer tool (https://apps.automeris.io/wpd/). Project attached, note that it is *not* a zipfile but a .tar file. To open it or load into Web Plot Digitizer you need to remove the .zip extension.
 

Attachments

  • 1585cycles.tar.zip
    260 KB · Views: 10
Top