why 80p for powerwall?

daromer

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Messages
5,590
Ahh that is No go. You should never have different Numbers or types in series unless you have deep testing done. Never Ever.

Parallel is ok but series isnt. It may work but IF you add Up that the cells allready from start can vary Up to 30% in current the cell count can get it Up to or above 50% variance per cell.

Same cell count. Same amount low as high capacity per pack internally random is best way doing it unless you plan to do it calculations with 4wire and you know the age. :)
 

wattwatt

Member
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
55
mike said:
No, not at all. This is exactly what I'm doing and it works GREAT. I even wrapped mine with heat shrink and the compression of the shrink creates a rock solid pack.

There's some info in this video...

What's the dimensions of each cell pack and then how wide are all 14 laid out like that??
 

OffGridInTheCity

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Messages
1,522
daromer said:
Ahh that is No go. You should never have different Numbers or types in series unless you have deep testing done. Never Ever.

Parallel is ok but series isnt. It may work but IF you add Up that the cells allready from start can vary Up to 30% in current the cell count can get it Up to or above 50% variance per cell.

Same cell count. Same amount low as high capacity per pack internally random is best way doing it unless you plan to do it calculations with 4wire and you know the age. :)
Note: All of my base packs were built to have (as close as i can) 130ah. I didn't worry about cell count, but focused on getting 130ah at 500ma discharge capacity.

My first battery is made up of 7s ICR18650 MF1 (2150mah) packs inseries with 7s Samsung ICR18650-22P-M (2200mah) and after 528 cycles its doing well with no balance problems. I agree these packs were pretty well matched - effectively the same 62cells per base pack, 124 per pack.

My second battery is a parallel mix of base packs. Each pack has 1 base pack of grey LGABB41865 (2600mah) in parallel with 1 base pack of Panasonic NCR18650A. This one has 350cycles. This is more to @Daromer's advice - e.g. parallel is OK.

image_lufvri.jpg


I did have an experience where I had 5 (of 14) packs made up of Green Sony US18650CR-G5 and G7(s) in series with the LGABB4185+NCR18650As and those 5 just would not balance/behave compared to the others. I'm talking 150mv differences no matter what I did. AND the packs has same 130+130 = 260ah. However, I put it down to IR and Chemistry rather than mix/match serialization. Maybe serialization compounded the Green Sony IR/chemistry mismatch. I set-aside those Green Sony cells because IR was over 200 compared to 100'ish on *all* the other cells.
 

daromer

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Messages
5,590
Once again the best method is to have same amount and mix 100% in each string. You may be Lucky and it works or you have to go back to the bench and redo. I dont like redoing :)
My packs Still just run and they are totally random but r by My Main criterias


:)
 

not2bme

Active member
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
485
I design mine at 60p only because I find that's the right speed for me in my spare time to build them without taking too much time. But then when I install it I put it in parallel with each other with 12ga wire. Currently they're stacked 6 high so it's an effective 360p. This allows me to slowly build my packs (I don't have mike's stamina on building 300p packs!). I find stacking them instead of the wall method allows you to have the most effective area. The wall method requires more wall space.


image_rnqodw.jpg


These packs stay within 30mVor better with each other. I make sure there are no self discharges by charging each cell up to full and have them sit for a minimum of 2 weeks. I find 1 week is too short and at about 2 weeks is where I really notice them. All it takes is just one cell to slowly drag down the rest of the pack. My packs are made out of two different batteries only, about 60% panasonics and 40% samsungs. This keeps the battery characteristics quite similar.
 

daromer

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Messages
5,590
You basically get same length with 100p as 80p if you stand the holders up. The problem there is that you get 5 cells in height instead of 4 and therfore cannot have the same easy layout of busbars. In that case 160p can be good as well to start with.
 

Korishan

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2017
Messages
6,422
Mike has 300p, or is it 400p(?) I don't recall ;)
 

wattwatt

Member
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
55
The Kilowatt Challenge said:
I still cant decide whether to go 80 or 100 either. For me, I'm thinking more about the structure of the plastic holders than the capacity of the battery. 80 works really well but 100 starts to get a bit heavy and bendy.

This brings up a good question... how often does one have to pull cell packs/modules for maintenance on harvested cells?
 

OffGridInTheCity

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Messages
1,522
crashintoty said:
TheKilowattChallenge said:
I still cant decide whether to go 80 or 100 either. For me, I'm thinking more about the structure of the plastic holders than the capacity of the battery. 80 works really well but 100 starts to get a bit heavy and bendy.

This brings up a good question... how often does one have to pull cell packs/modules for maintenance on harvested cells?
Great question. My oldest pack is only 2 years and no sign of needing attention yet, but of course its inevitable. I'm hoping for at least 5-10 yrs before having to become an expert on pack recondition/repair ... but we'll see :)
 

daromer

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Messages
5,590
I have not switced a single One since i.started. with that sida i run very Good cells. Second hand fullt and not following proper testing perhaps once per year
 
Top