Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Panasonic NCR18650B Cell Specifications
#1
Warning: The information in this thread was obtained from various sources on the Internet, including any datasheets linked below, and is provided for reference only. It is not guaranteed to be accurate. To prevent fire or personal injury, never charge or discharge a cell before verifying the information yourself using the original specifications sheet provided by the manufacturer.

Brand:Panasonic
Model:NCR18650B
Capacity:3200mAh Rated
Voltage:3.60V Nominal
Charging:4.20V Maximum
1625mA Standard
--- mA Maximum
Discharging:2.50V Cutoff
640mA Standard
6400mA Maximum
Description:Green (Light) Cell Wrapper
White Insulator Ring
18650 Form Factor

Data References:
https://na.industrial.panasonic.com/site...18650b.pdf

Pictures:
HIGH CAPACITY!! 3400mAh Panasonic 18650 Cells, Only $1.25/ea!
^ Use discount code "BATTERY" for 10% off!
Reply
#2
Some say, these are those inside Tesla's power packs. is it true?
Aiming for -> 48V 14s100p | 200Ah | 10KWh  | 1.5Kw Solar | 10KW inverter (2X 5KW tandem setup) | 
Check my progress: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXfC57i...iL62J4YLPg
Reply
#3
Tesla uses 2170's IIRC so not quite the same. I'm guessing it's close but not close enough to warrant going 2170 over 18650.
MissSolar likes this post
Reply
#4
My zanflare is testing several these at nearly 3500mah...underrated or malfunctioning tester?
Reply
#5
(07-27-2018, 03:18 AM)xxlawman87xx Wrote: My zanflare is testing several these at nearly 3500mah...underrated or malfunctioning tester?

Probably underrated. The spec sheet says rated at 3200mAh typical is 3350mah, and "typical" means there are some above it.
HIGH CAPACITY!! 3400mAh Panasonic 18650 Cells, Only $1.25/ea!
^ Use discount code "BATTERY" for 10% off!
Reply
#6
(01-16-2018, 04:48 PM)Mario Dinis Wrote: Some say, these are those inside Tesla's power packs. is it true?

they do use panasonic brand.

(08-03-2018, 11:13 AM)mike Wrote:
(07-27-2018, 03:18 AM)xxlawman87xx Wrote: My zanflare is testing several these at nearly 3500mah...underrated or malfunctioning tester?

Probably underrated. The spec sheet says rated at 3200mAh typical is 3350mah, and "typical" means there are some above it.

Aren't they supposed to be rated at 3400mah?..
Reply
#7
Zanflair is the problem. 8 to 11 percent inflated results.

Please see my test of Zanflair, Opus, and LiitoKala on Brand new Cells.
https://secondlifestorage.com/t-Zanflair...Kala-Tests

Wolf
For Info Google Drive

Great ABB shunt breaker seller River City Industrial
Great prices and superb service.
 [Image: em2566%20(1)__19172.1521541365.jpg?c=2]

Not your average Wolf       
            Cool
Reply
#8
Hi all I have tested near 900 hundred of these using liitokala and get a mix 3000 up to 3500mah. I would say that the majority is in the 3200 range. But as these are second hand any thing under 3000mah has been heavily used.

Karl
Reply
#9
(12-18-2018, 06:18 AM)KBoffGrid Wrote: Hi all I have tested near 900 hundred of these using liitokala and get a mix 3000 up to 3500mah. I would say that the majority is in the 3200 range. But as these are second hand any thing under 3000mah has been heavily used.

Karl

The LiitoKala is one of the more accurate testers out there and I would trust your experience with these cells.
It would be neat to maybe get an IR reading of some of the cells below 3000mAh from the LiitoKala and maybe a couple of the 3500mAh and 3200mAh.
If you happen to have a little time.

See my tester evaluation https://secondlifestorage.com/t-LiitoKal...rs-Testers
Thanks
Wolf
For Info Google Drive

Great ABB shunt breaker seller River City Industrial
Great prices and superb service.
 [Image: em2566%20(1)__19172.1521541365.jpg?c=2]

Not your average Wolf       
            Cool
Reply
#10
Has anyone else tested around 3800 mAh @ 500 mA on these? Only three of them but still. I use the Lii-500 as everyone else and several to rule out one particular channel or charger.
Cells tested: 4087
Average capacity: 2082 mAh
Left to process: 165 kg
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)