Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Oil immersion?
#11
Search for "Thermal Runaway Testing of 18650 Lithium Ion Cells - NASA" it is a PDF with full testing.

I think the standard plastic spacers are too close together AND the plastic is flamable so when the cell heats up on the outside and starts to break down the plastic that adds to the combustable gasses.

If a single hot cell is the source ignition point with a suitable air gap it should be safe, however the air gap has to be all round and not just cell to cell.. If a single heater cell is allowed to have some time to warm up neighbouring cells, due to the lack of airflow then a cascade becomes more likely as the incremental heat required to set off the next cell is reduced.

The ideal pack may well end up larger, however it would be safer so depends on what the trade off is between build speed/parts/quality/ease to build/asthetics vs risk.
OffGridInTheCity likes this post
If you can't quantify how much they cost, it's a deal, I'll buy 5 of them for 3 lumps of rocking horse ......
Reply
#12
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files...lobato.pdf

Reading it right now...very interesting, already got some answers.
Thanks completelycharged
Reply
#13
(08-04-2019, 12:45 PM)100kwh-hunter Wrote: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files...lobato.pdf

Reading it right now...very interesting, already got some answers.
Thanks completelycharged

Reading over it as well. Interesting in the graph with the summary of the 18 tests, it shows that during TR (thermal runaway) the temperatures experienced are very unpredictable.
The only safe way of containing any of these TR events would be that each cell would be vented into a steel tube, and the tube would need to be over the Pos end slightly as sometimes the whole innards of the cell gets ejected (depending on cell can design) Confused
Proceed with caution. Knowledge is Power! Literally! Cool 
Knowledge is Power; Absolute Knowledge is Absolutely Shocking!
Certified 18650 Cell Reclamation Technician

Please come join in general chit-chat and randomness at Discord Chat (channels: general, 3d-printing, linux&coding, 18650, humor, ...)
(this chat is not directly affiliated with SecondLifeStorage; VALID email req'd)
Reply
#14
Wouldn't the oil prevent any sparks from igniting the venting gas? Then the cells can get as hot as they like but no explosive fire.
Reply
#15
Agree on the steel/alu tube, but in case of some sparks to prevent a cascade, to prevent a short circuit,
There must be another solution added, like sand on top of your pack.
Or in stead that they are "standing", put them on their side, then would a steel tube be effective.

In my case for 100kw storage it would be impractical to cut or order 14.000 steel tubes and make cell holders out of them.

If you place sand on top of your cells and you get a TR the sparks will not short circuit the pack.
But the heat that is generated by the TR cell can not escape, and thus can light up the sleeves of the other cells.

To make 140 (in my case) buckets with a soft plastic bottom and fill that with sand, its for me also not practical.
It could work.
A TR must blow fire/sparks to let the plastic melt, so the sand will go down on the cells.
But as we could see, some TR only had some smoke, for sand in plastic bags on top of your cells you need some fire.
So it won't be hot enough, so no need for a melt.

And the certain amount of sand needed to cover a pack.
Also when the sand is pouring down, must be hold to cover the pack, so i does not flow away.
Sand has a other problem, weight.

To be practical, for a safe fire preventing solution i think one or two sprinkler per pack, with that fl-500 stuff.
The standard sprinkler would go off at 68C for 1,50E each.

In all the above cases, you need to give each pack its own room or if something might happen, lose your whole pw, instead of one pack.

Oke we make sure that we only keep the good cells, we fuse, and do our calculations.
Even with all that safety connected, it could be possible for a TR, just....it....might....be...could...be...happening.
Even if there is one cell that could go into TR and there is a very big chance that it will stay with that one cell.
What if that one in a million shot is going to happen???
On yt you have some vids of 100 cells, 500 max, on security cams.(bigger??? show me, please)
But now 14.000 cells???

Soon i will have the projects done and i will post some pictures and results, time.....also waiting for the rubber boat from china.

Best

If a cell goes into TR, it can ignite the oil, you really don't want that.
Most oils will dissolve some plastic over time, and get rangid.

Best
Reply
#16
(08-03-2019, 01:22 PM)100kwh-hunter Wrote: I agree on strongly against the idea of oil...
I am busy with some experiments for the case of a thermal runaway.
So far i have 3 setups for sand.
Even a setup is in the make with a sprinkler system, one filled with water and the other one i want to fill it with a special kind of fire extinguishing fluid, fairly new stuff, especially designed for li ion fire.

AAAAND  i can not find the link anymore.......

its called f-500
https://www.pengsafety.nl/brandblusmidde...rijen-769/

My link had 3 9 and 500 liter, was a store in The Netherlands, closer to you btw.

I've also been looking at F500 for a fire suppression system, my initial thoughts were for a glass bulb type sprinkler system connected to a pressurised vessel containing a 3-6% solution of F500.
This vessel would be connected to a nitrogen cylinder for the system propellant.
The sprinkler line would have a solenoid valve that fails open, this would be controlled via a fire detection system and held closed, once a sudden heat rise and or smoke was detected it would de-energise the solenoid and allow the F500 mix to the sprinkler heads. The sprinkler heads are now primed ready to actuate if the temperature continues to rise.

As this would in a sense be a two knock system it should prevent any accidental discharge from the system. i.e. accidental damage to a sprinkler head, false alarm or power failure at the solenoid etc, it would need a fire detection and a heat source present before the F500 could be released.

I have almost all of the materials needed to implement the system already, I only need to find a UK supplier for the F500 encapsulation agent in the smaller quantities i require.

Also getting the battery house built so I have somewhere to install it might help LoL.
100kwh-hunter likes this post
UK Southwest.

7 kWp Solar Panels (28 x 250Wp Shinetime Mono).
14 X APS YC500i Micro Inverters.
28 X 40P 18650 cell packs/modules configured as 14S 80P.
Sofar Mass Energy ME3000SP AC coupled charger/inverter.
Still sourcing and processing cells for powerwall.
Reply
#17
@ chuckp:
I have almost all of the materials needed to implement the system already, I only need to find a UK supplier for the F500 encapsulation agent in the smaller quantities i require.

I like your idea of the valves.
Its one sprinkler that is going off, the pack does not need 100 litres of that stuff, 2 max.

But oke, if i am going to buy, i can send you some? if you would like of course?

With best regards
chuckp likes this post
Reply
#18
(08-09-2019, 06:20 PM)100kwh-hunter Wrote: @ chuckp:
I have almost all of the materials needed to implement the system already, I only need to find a UK supplier for the F500 encapsulation agent in the smaller quantities i require.

I like your idea of the valves.
Its one sprinkler that is going off, the pack does not need 100 litres of that stuff, 2 max.

But oke, if i am going to buy, i can send you some? if you would like of course?

With best regards

Thanks that’s great.

I already have everything needed to put in a nitrogen sprinkler system.
Adding the F500 would only be an additional solution storage vessel, adding a solenoid valve that I’ve probably got somewhere and a fire detection panel, smoke and heat detectors, I can grab those from work.

Actually now I think about we have an old stainless steel water softener kicking around that I could remove the brine tank from.
UK Southwest.

7 kWp Solar Panels (28 x 250Wp Shinetime Mono).
14 X APS YC500i Micro Inverters.
28 X 40P 18650 cell packs/modules configured as 14S 80P.
Sofar Mass Energy ME3000SP AC coupled charger/inverter.
Still sourcing and processing cells for powerwall.
Reply
#19
(08-10-2019, 08:01 AM)chuckp Wrote: Thanks that’s great.

I already have everything needed to put in a nitrogen sprinkler system.
Adding the F500 would only be an additional solution storage vessel, adding a solenoid valve that I’ve probably got somewhere and a fire detection panel, smoke and heat detectors, I can grab those from work.

Actually now I think about we have an old stainless steel water softener kicking around that I could remove the brine tank from.


Here is an snip from an article about Lithium battery fires:

The FAA special conditions document explained, “In general, lithium batteries are significantly more susceptible than their [nickel-cadmium] or lead-acid counterparts to internal failures that can result in self-sustaining increases in temperature and pressure (thermal runaway). This is especially true for overcharging, which causes heating and destabilization of the components of the lithium-battery cell, which can lead to the formation, by plating, of highly unstable metallic lithium. The metallic lithium can ignite, resulting in a self-sustaining fire or explosion. The severity of thermal runaway due to overcharging increases with increased battery capacity due to the higher amount of electrolyte in large batteries.”

https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/...nformation

I noticed the Self-Sustaning bit.  This means that Nitrogen will not work.  Nitrogen's purpose is to displace Oxygen.  Self sustaining reactions will still burn in a Nitrogen rich environment.

Sounds like cooling is the best thing to do and that F500 Encapsulator Agent sounds interesting though.
Reply
#20
Due to the compounds in the electrolyte, Oxygen is present, this is why it's self sustaining. Agree with Bubba on the cooling is the only option. Using hadron or other suppressants have been topics of discussion before and it all leads back to this: Keep the cells cool at all times. This is why keeping an eye on the temperatures is so important with lithium-cobalt (and it's close cousins)*. If temps raise too high, kill the charge/discharge to those cells. It's better to loose power in the house/equipment than it is to have a fire you can't control.



* - there's also lithium manganese and other variants that are susceptible to these fires. Lithium Iron (LiFePO4) is one of the few that have a hard time igniting and is far safer than the other chemistries. This does not meant they "won't" catch fire, but that it is much harder to do so.
Proceed with caution. Knowledge is Power! Literally! Cool 
Knowledge is Power; Absolute Knowledge is Absolutely Shocking!
Certified 18650 Cell Reclamation Technician

Please come join in general chit-chat and randomness at Discord Chat (channels: general, 3d-printing, linux&coding, 18650, humor, ...)
(this chat is not directly affiliated with SecondLifeStorage; VALID email req'd)
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)