A while back I was thinking about how to test how similar the results from our different testers are.
There has been a lot of discussion about how accurate (or not) the testers are and what sort of precision can be expected during testing.
If we want to see if the our testers give the same results as each other, using a cell to test is problematic - cells behave differently during different conditions that exist during different test cycles.
Using exactly the same cell with the same TP4056 charger, and the same ZB206 will give varying results from one test to the next.
The same variable test results will occur with other chargers/testers as well.
Therefore, to check how similar the results of our capacity testers are, I thought of using something else to simulate the cell.
I tried using a PC power supply and connecting the orange +3.3v wires and black wire to one of my ZB206 testers and started a test. The tester started testing happily. When I disconnected the wires, the test completed.
Next to compare 2 of the zb206 testers results, I ran a timed test for 3 minutes on one of the zb206 testers.
This gave a result of 50mah and 0.169wh
I ran a test on a second ZB206 for 3 minutes again and the results were 50mah and 0.170wh
This looks to me like the results between these 2 testers are very close! I think that the .001wh difference can be put down to test process error (a slight difference in timing of the tests), rather than a difference between the testers.
Has anyone else tried testing that their testers give consistent and comparable results?
By ruling out the variation that a cell would introduce, this test process seems likea good way to test that your testers are all giving consistent results.
What do you think of this testing of the testers?
There has been a lot of discussion about how accurate (or not) the testers are and what sort of precision can be expected during testing.
If we want to see if the our testers give the same results as each other, using a cell to test is problematic - cells behave differently during different conditions that exist during different test cycles.
Using exactly the same cell with the same TP4056 charger, and the same ZB206 will give varying results from one test to the next.
The same variable test results will occur with other chargers/testers as well.
Therefore, to check how similar the results of our capacity testers are, I thought of using something else to simulate the cell.
I tried using a PC power supply and connecting the orange +3.3v wires and black wire to one of my ZB206 testers and started a test. The tester started testing happily. When I disconnected the wires, the test completed.
Next to compare 2 of the zb206 testers results, I ran a timed test for 3 minutes on one of the zb206 testers.
This gave a result of 50mah and 0.169wh
I ran a test on a second ZB206 for 3 minutes again and the results were 50mah and 0.170wh
This looks to me like the results between these 2 testers are very close! I think that the .001wh difference can be put down to test process error (a slight difference in timing of the tests), rather than a difference between the testers.
Has anyone else tried testing that their testers give consistent and comparable results?
By ruling out the variation that a cell would introduce, this test process seems likea good way to test that your testers are all giving consistent results.
What do you think of this testing of the testers?